Dinosaur Exhibit As Informational Facility

Went to the Canadian Museum of Nature today. Good stuff. Started of course with the dinosaur exhibit.

Once upon a time the quality of a museum exhibit might depend on the rarity and completeness of the fossils in its collection. Nowadays those exhibits aren’t so much about the possession of physical things. Museums have long used a kind of information abstraction and re-presentation by putting plaster casts of fossils on display, and keeping the delicate real deal in the basement. Today we saw imposing fossils that might or might not have had their originals stored in Ottawa, but we also saw:

  • A reconstruction of a rare proto-seal skeleton, assembled by a 3d printer from a model generated from a laser scan of actual fossilized remains.
  • A collection of convincing computer animations of dinosaurs, nicely directed for dramatic effect and storyline but also demonstrating movement kinetics, interaction with their local ecosystem and collective behaviour, things that a static display of animal parts can’t do well.

Puijila darwini: not a fossil.

The museum was kind of a place for storing paleontological artifacts that you couldn’t see other places. But it was more of a venue for high-production-value information visualization. Worked for me

15 comments:

which traditionally are quite

ifferent from place to place

are now closer in feel and bounce

than at any other time, which

would be one reason Djokovic

can win everywhere and in particular

can still expect to make a Grand Slam

a goal he nearly reached in 2021,

when Daniil Medvedev stopped

him at Flushing Meadows

Beaten in three sets, he was

visibly crushed. But he was patient

Australian border authorities

detained him for being

Could you delve into how this varies internationally?

leave a comment